The Setting
Civil War sites abound in history-rich Virginia,
but finding and interpreting them was a job
left to the visitor. Many war-related places
were unknown outside their vicinities
and others faced possible destruction by
commercial and residential development.
Wasn’t there some way to save the sites at
risk, capitalize on the vast untapped tourism
potential, and make the tourist’s experience
more pleasant and informative?
Avid history buffs from around the country travel to Virginia
annually to visit the battlegrounds of lore: Manassas, Petersburg,
Wilderness. But if you didn’t grow up in the Commonwealth
of Virginia, odds are that many of the events, people, and places
there that tell the story of the American Civil War are only
barely known to you. There are hundreds of sites in this state—where
more than 60 percent of that bloody war was waged—that
bespeak history better than any textbook ever could. Yet, even
the most diligent
amateur historian would have trouble routing out the myriad details
of the battles, sieges, and machinations of an intricate conflict
waged by skilled military leaders and home-grown warriors alike.
“We have close to 300 sites that tell a piece of the tale
of Civil War, right here in our state,” says Jack Berry,
director of the Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). “But
no two places were talking to each other. No two jurisdictions
were conferring on how best to put their history to work and
build a solid base for heritage tourism and economic development.”
To be fair, promoting its own history has always been a big
priority in the Old Dominion. Almost since the very day in 1865
when Lee surrendered his Confederate forces to Grant at Appomattox,
dedicated enthusiasts have made sure visitors are aware of the
significance of Virginia’s contributions and sacrifices
in the war. In the 1920s, the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) installed roadside historical markers along routes where
armies advanced or retreated or where skirmishes and battles
were waged. But these markers stood alone. It was up to the intrepid
traveler to seek them out or, more likely, stumble across them.
Then there were all the places only locals knew about. Some
places may not have played as significant
a role in the war’s outcome, but their participation is
nonetheless interesting to tourists. Yet, with limited
to no marketing budgets or experience, those sites languished,
at risk of permanently being forgotten.
So there sat this state, loaded with as much American history
as you could stuff into its boundaries. But without a cohesive,
well-coordinated, heavily marketed tourism campaign, it was losing
potential revenue. The historical resources were all there. But
who could pull them together and how?
“I think it’s important to get across that
a program of this size and magnitude only happens through
collaboration. We’ve had an overwhelming amount of
participation across all segments of the state population—from
private citizens
to state agencies. No one person did this by themselves.”
—
Jack Berry, director, Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau |
Return
to summary
|