How To Get Started
Success Stories
Resources
About Us
Home
Cultural Heritage Tourism
 

Made possible by the American Express Company.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This section supported by:

Web site managed by


The Setting
What Happened Next
Results


Beyond the Grand Canyon

The Setting

More than half the states in the country have dedicated cultural heritage tourism programs at the state level. Most are housed in state tourism offices, but some states have found innovative ways to spearhead cultural heritage tourism efforts from less traditional agencies. State arts councils and historic preservation offices are somewhat typical. But a humanities slant in Arizona has given that state its own breed of cultural heritage tourism to promote.

 

Arizona. The name evokes images of sun-drenched golf courses, desert retreats, and the Grand Canyon. Not for lack of trying, the state of Arizona has become, over the last century, an oasis of warm relaxation and recreation. And a few large cities, resorts, and natural wonders have profited greatly from this tourism ideal.

But Arizona is a large state with several distinct regions and a wide range of vegetative, geographical, and climactic offerings. What’s more, Arizona contains hundreds of treasures unique to its cultural heritage and evolution into a modern state. From the Wild West of renown to the Spanish heritage introduced by explorers such as Coronado, from the ancient indigenous peoples whose lives define the past and intersect with the present to the 20th-century automotive legacy of Route 66, Arizona is replete with cultural and historic attractions.

It is the job of the Arizona Humanities Council (AHC) to preserve, maintain, and interpret all aspects of this rich culture and heritage. As an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), AHC has supported cultural heritage product development for more than 25 years, funding or directing literally thousands of activities.

The organization’s goal in the mid-1990s was to help Arizona’s cultural heritage sites become stronger tourist attractions while maintaining their authenticity and simultaneously becoming fiscally sound. In many states, cultural heritage tourism programs come out of the state tourism office. But, as Dan Shilling, AHC executive director, points out, “Tourism agencies are often just marketing programs. They advertise the state but they don’t actually build or enhance the products they market—just as they market the Grand Canyon, but depend on the National Park Service and other agencies to actually maintain and enhance the product.” AHC, he continues, “...is in the product development game, so the Arizona Office of Tourism supports our efforts because we will give them a better product to market.”

“We’re a tremendous cultural heritage market with all our assets,” continues Shilling. “But many of our heritage-based sites are small and struggling. They recognize that they have unique attractions to offer visitors, but they don’t know how to develop them into viable tourism products, nor do they have the funds.”

In a conservative state like Arizona, arguments to preserve and promote culture and arts are not as effective as ones that address economic recovery. AHC needed to find a vehicle to make a stronger case to the legislature. Cultural heritage tourism is one that has potential because it talks about economic development, not just culture.

Having stumbled on an old cultural tourism study from the late 1970s, Shilling realized that if the state’s economic development entities and legislature were aware of the huge economic potential just waiting to be tapped, they would be more likely to get behind the idea of funding and promoting cultural heritage tourism sites and activities. It was time to gather the facts and take them to the people.

“The truth is, we can provide all of the directions, marketing, and advice we want and some nice efforts will get started, but until we get some increased funding, we really won’t begin to take advantage of this form of tourism.”
— Dan Shilling, executive director, Arizona Humanities Council


What Happened Next

A 1997 study funded by AHC, the Arizona Community Foundation, Arizona Office of Tourism, and the Museum Association of Arizona (MAA), produced impressive facts and statistics regarding the condition of cultural heritage tourism in the country at large and the vast potential for an improved economy through cultural heritage tourism that awaited Arizona. AHC took the findings and produced a 16-page booklet that outlined how Arizona is poised for success in the cultural heritage arena, the changes such an initiative could produce, and the need to develop products to help cultural institutions improve their products and market themselves more effectively. The booklet, distributed widely throughout the state to cultural, heritage, tourism, and government entities concerned with Arizona’s economy and quality of life, had the positive effect of convincing some major players to join hands over the cultural heritage tourism table.

Through that study, AHC identified the three key communities that had to be involved in order to advance effective cultural heritage tourism programs: the museum and cultural sites themselves, tourists, and economic development organizations. From there, AHC set out to find appropriate partners to help develop methods and products for each segment.

Working jointly with MAA, using an Institute of Museum and Library Services grant, AHC researched and produced the 48-page workbook, Cultural Heritage Tourism. This guide helps historical and heritage institutions develop cultural-based tourism attractions by addressing topics such as deciding when your community is ready for tourism, knowing if your institution is ready, developing partnerships, developing products to tell your story, marketing and advertising, and where to turn for further assistance.

The preface to the 2000 workbook states “While there exists considerable research supporting the economic and quality of life benefits of cultural heritage tourism... little information is available about how to actually do it…This workbook addresses that void, by identifying issues to consider and offering step-by-step examples, many of them drawn from case studies.”

To reach out to tourists, AHC revised its website, Arizona History Traveler, dramatically improving the online resource to help potential travelers plan a visit to suit their every desire. Natural and cultural attractions are highlighted by clearly defined geographical regions at www.azhistorytraveler.org.

AHC addresses the business end of cultural heritage tourism with its recently produced CD-ROM, Cultural Heritage Tourism: Economic Development and Quality of Life. Narrated by historian Marshall Trimble, the PowerPoint presentation describes how communities can bolster their local economies and nourish their quality of life through effective cultural heritage tourism. Including demonstrations of how cultural heritage sites and businesses can work together to develop jointly beneficial initiatives, the CD-ROM is distributed to chambers of commerce, offices of tourism, convention and visitors bureaus, and other economic development agencies throughout the state. “We’re using this tool to say to these groups, ‘If you’re in tourism and not considering cultural heritage, you could be overlooking something significant in your community,’” says Shilling.

An adjunct to the CD-ROM is a brochure designed by MAA that outlines the economic impact that museums bring to a region. Also from MAA is a 30-second television public service announcement that makes the same case. MAA and AHC encourage the use of these materials by museums and other cultural heritage sites to help them build awareness of their potential economic contributions to the community.


Results

AHC-spearheaded efforts have fostered strong collaborations between the tourism and cultural heritage industries in communities throughout the state. Small towns like Payson, Snowflake, Bisbee, and Winslow have taken this concept to heart and are attempting to build their tourism programs around history and heritage. But the key to progress in building a sustainable cultural heritage tourism industry in Arizona is getting more money from the legislature. “We need serious product-development funding to enable these woefully underfunded institutions to even play in the tourism game,” declares Shilling. “That will be the real test—after we’ve done the research, provided the workbooks, done the presentations—to get the funding to build product and encourage partnerships.”

AHC’s chances of fulfilling this mission get stronger every day as new statewide and local alliances are built. The Arizona Tourism Alliance, a lobbying association, has testified on AHC’s behalf to the state, and the Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records is the conduit for AHC’s bill for funding to the legislature in 2001. With the right kind of support, Shilling says, “We envision being able to award grants in the $50,000 - $75,000 range, which is what museums really need if they are going to have a fighting chance.” As a result of the research and the partnerships that were created, AHC collaborated with the Arizona Community Foundation, Arizona Commission on the Arts, and Arizona Department of Commerce to create an “Arts and Culture Build Communities” fund in 2001. The project awarded nearly $200,000, mostly in rural areas to support cultural tourism.


The Setting
What Happened Next
Results